shad trees, shad restrictions
May. 23rd, 2017 08:20 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
When I was telling my father about the fish elevator and all those shad, he told me that he'd learned from a friend that mountain laurel, which blooms around now, is known as "the shad tree"--because when it blooms, that's when the shad run.
He just called to tell me I'd misunderstood: It's not that mountain laurel are called shad tree, but that there's another tree, that blooms at the same time as mountain laurel, called shad tree. Actually, several trees in the genus Amelanchier go by that name, including this, Amelanchier bartramaiana, the mountain shadbush (also known as oblong serviceberry--ahh, names):

(Source)
(Here's a photo from Flickr of mountain laurel--not a shad tree or shadbush--by Flickr user Robert Ferraro--you can click through to see it larger.)

He also told me that there was a law in Boston in the 18th century that you couldn't feed apprentices shad more than twice a week... which gives you a sense of its plentifulness at that time (and its low regard). (I searched law+apprentices+shad and found confirmation in a Google books excerpt from The Literary Era: A Repository of Literary and Miscellaneous Information (published 1901), which says,
He just called to tell me I'd misunderstood: It's not that mountain laurel are called shad tree, but that there's another tree, that blooms at the same time as mountain laurel, called shad tree. Actually, several trees in the genus Amelanchier go by that name, including this, Amelanchier bartramaiana, the mountain shadbush (also known as oblong serviceberry--ahh, names):
(Source)
(Here's a photo from Flickr of mountain laurel--not a shad tree or shadbush--by Flickr user Robert Ferraro--you can click through to see it larger.)

He also told me that there was a law in Boston in the 18th century that you couldn't feed apprentices shad more than twice a week... which gives you a sense of its plentifulness at that time (and its low regard). (I searched law+apprentices+shad and found confirmation in a Google books excerpt from The Literary Era: A Repository of Literary and Miscellaneous Information (published 1901), which says,
From a recently published report of the Pennsylvania Fish Commission, it would appear that similar troubles were not unknown in eighteenth-century Philadelphia. The low prices of fish tempted many master mechanics to keep their apprentices on a lenten diet. Shad were particularly common and particularly cheap--so common and so cheap, in fact, that they were considered fit only for Indians, helots, and apprentices. The apprentices revolted ... The youngsters ... triumphed so far that the law relating to indentures was changed so that the boys "were not to be fed on fish more than twice a week." (p. 298)
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-24 06:17 pm (UTC)...and I just checked with Google, which says it's actually a mixed story. Some stocks are doing just fine, but others (especially the one in Southern New England) are collapsing, although this seems to be more due to environmental change than overfishing. Which is still a human-driven cause, heh.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 01:48 pm (UTC)Beef and oyster pies and puddings had been a classic Victorian dish. The poorer you were, the more oysters you put in. Rich folk bigged up the amount of beefsteak."
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 01:58 pm (UTC)I wonder if it's because we no longer put untreated sewage into the water?
Oysters, being filter feeders, are prime vector for Hepatitis A etc if you put untreated sewage into the Thames...
(This would be doubly relevant back when cholera was A Thing.)
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:13 pm (UTC)I bet you're right about the sewage and the rebounding populations. I know some coastal areas have done habitat restoration, too.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:21 pm (UTC)I know it is not environmentally altruistic to want sustainable seafood so that someday I can eat all the oysters I want without concern for the population, but someday I want to eat all the oysters I want.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:26 pm (UTC)Oh, good. Oysters taste great.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 05:53 pm (UTC)a) oysters made people sick, therefore people who could afford NOT to eat them didn't eat them,
not that
b) raw sewage meant there were less oysters, and sewage treatment meant there were more oysters.
But b) is probably true as well...
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 02:02 pm (UTC)Chun Woo marvels as often as we eat them that oysters and lobsters used to be considered low-class trashy food.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 03:14 pm (UTC)I knew this and I have no idea why. I like the idea of it being a fish tree, though, glittering with scales in spring, laden with roe in the fall.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 05:01 pm (UTC)The old man of the wilderness asked of me
How many strawberries grow in the sea
I answered him as I thought good
As many red herrings as swim in the wood.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-23 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-24 01:01 pm (UTC)mountain laurel: "I'm going to have fancy crimped petals, and little dots, and pretty stamens, and furthermore when I'm in bud, the buds will look like little stars."
cinqfoil: "I ... I'm just going with, y'know, five petals a-around a center. That's it."
And yet the simple flowers are so pretty too. WHAT A GREAT WORLD.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-24 05:32 am (UTC)I am particularly amused by the laws since if I pass my SAR exam next month, I'll be an Apprentice tracker, haha. Fish forever!
no subject
Date: 2017-05-24 01:02 pm (UTC)And yeah, wouldn't it be great if we could eat all those things that were cheap as dirt back in the day but are now luxuries?
no subject
Date: 2017-05-24 09:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-24 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-24 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-25 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-31 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-31 05:41 pm (UTC)