(no subject)

Mar. 5th, 2026 01:25 pm
maju: Clean my kitchen (Default)
[personal profile] maju
I would be very happy if we didn't have to go through a time change twice a year, but even so, my heart sinks when I hear about places which have adopted DST for the whole year rather than standard time, because I really really don't like DST and I'm afraid that eventually, wherever I'm living will change to permanent DST. I hate dark mornings and I'm not fond of long light evenings either. I actually don't understand why it's considered preferable to be on permanent DST rather than permanent standard time, considering that the end result is that, guess what, we have the exact same amount of daylight (and darkness) whatever system we're using to mark it. There will always be people going to or from their place of work or children going to or from school in darkness at some times of the year. There will always be some people who would prefer to get up early and would like more light in the mornings, and some who prefer to stay up late and would like more light in the evenings. But if standard time used to be the norm and DST was imposed at some later date, why not revert to the norm rather than changing permanently to the imposed system?

After the pleasant weather yesterday, today it's grey and rainy. Spring comes in fits and starts; it's predicted to be around 60°F/15°C early next week.

I'm preparing to make some of my egg muffins for lunches this week, so there are some ingredients in the freezer and a box of two dozen eggs in the fridge. Yesterday evening Aria was looking for something to eat in the fridge; she noticed the eggs and immediately begged me to make the muffins there and then so she could help. I had been planning to make them today or tomorrow, but I've decided to do them Saturday morning so Aria can have the fun of cracking 18 eggs into a bowl and whisking them.
bluerosekatie: 3D render of a Bionicle character wearing a purple mask. (Default)
[personal profile] bluerosekatie posting in [community profile] fancake
Fandom: The Protomen
Pairings/Characters: Protoman & Megaman, Protoman & Dr. Thomas Light, Protoman & Dr. Albert Wily
Rating: Unrated, estimated to be Teen and Up
Length: 3,178
Creator Links: ricefu on Ao3
Theme:
Siblings, Science Fiction, Apocalypse/Dystopia, Robots, Androids and AI, Trauma & Recovery, (Not Really) Character Death, Old Fandoms
Summary:
You have heard me tell this story many times before you sleep... This time listen carefully.
Reccer's Notes:
A beautiful and sad character study of Protoman, the older sibling of two tragic brothers in the Protomen universe. It connects his backstory and dives into psyche throughout the canon storyline, including his relationship with his younger brother, his father, and the main antagonist. Although I'm tagging the Not Really Character Death theme for a reason, this is a tragedy, so tread carefully.

Fanwork Links:
The Inevitable Fall of the Firstborn on Ao3

A little work

Mar. 5th, 2026 11:31 am
bill_schubert: (Default)
[personal profile] bill_schubert
Turns out that my sister @susandennis, mentioned being offered a pay gig just shortly after I was offered one. Hers was customer service, mine consulting. Hers, likely many customers. Mine is only one.

My friendly bookkeeper with whom I network monthly and who I've known for 15 years or so is making some changes and wants to see if she can streamline with AI. So she asked me to help and wants to pay me. I had no idea what she wants to pay but she seemed to think that I was not going to ask for enough. So I went through ChatGPT and had a discussion and my value is around $150/hour so I'm going with a version of that. At least for the first part of the set up. Block of a project with a $2k flat rate. It will likely involve more than the 13 hours but it will be fun for me and likely a one off. And they are good people to work with.

But if the first project is successful it may grow into much more. I suspect that if I can wrap my mind around the processes I can save them a lot more than they are paying me. All the time having fun.

The way it should be.

Other than that things are fine and dandy. I've got an open day that I've turned into a bit of consulting study and getting my car inspected so I can register it.

And today is Toby's 9th birthday:

PXL_20260303_011257516.PORTRAIT

We celebrated by taking him to the vet for annual shots. He was not amused.
[syndicated profile] theatlantic_health_feed

Posted by Benjamin Mazer

Updated at 1:20 p.m. ET on March 5, 2026

The surgeon general may be the nation’s doctor, but she’s not your doctor. At least that’s the view of Casey Means, the physician turned wellness influencer who is vying for the role. When asked during her recent Senate confirmation hearing whether she would encourage parents to vaccinate their children against measles—hardly a theoretical question, given the country’s ongoing outbreak—Means delivered an elliptical response. She supported vaccines as a public-health tool but wouldn’t necessarily encourage someone to get them. “I am not an individual’s doctor,” she said. (In fact, she is no one’s doctor at the moment, because she lacks an active medical license.) “And every individual needs to talk to their doctor before putting a medication into their body.”

Means’s nonanswer was more than a dodge. It represents a paradox in the Trump administration’s approach to public health. Means, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and their allies have consistently eroded confidence in the medical establishment—even as they propose to solve the widespread mistrust of public health by encouraging Americans to talk to their doctor.

Kennedy and his subordinates have spent the past year infusing this approach into federal immunization policy. In October, the CDC announced that it would no longer encourage universal COVID boosters for either adults or children. Instead, a process known as “shared clinical decision-making,” in which doctors engage their patient in a detailed conversation about the pros and cons of the vaccine without defaulting to an endorsement, was the recommended approach. Jim O’Neill, the acting CDC director at the time, said in a press release that the previous guidance “deterred health care providers from talking about the risks and benefits of vaccination for the individual patient or parent.” In January, the CDC went one step further, striking several more vaccines—those against rotavirus, influenza, meningococcal disease, and hepatitis A and B—from the routine-childhood-immunization schedule. Shared decision making would be the preferred approach for these immunizations as well. On a podcast, Kennedy touted the move as returning “freedom of choice to American mothers.”

Who could argue against freedom of choice? The difficulty is that in medicine, shared decision making is not simply a synonym for allowing a patient to ask questions and decide for themselves. That sequence of events is covered by informed consent, a process that takes place before any medical intervention, including vaccination. Shared decision making, in contrast, is a somewhat nebulous term reserved for clinical borderlands: scenarios in which the trade-offs are nuanced or the best course of action is unclear.

Perhaps the most notable example of shared decision making in my area of medical practice is prostate-cancer screening. A handful of large, randomized studies have examined whether the prostate-specific-antigen blood test truly saves lives by detecting cancers earlier. These trials have yielded mixed results, suggesting that, at most, only a small number of men might avoid dying from cancer by getting checked. In contrast, the potential harms of treating an asymptomatic tumor that would not otherwise have been discovered—lifelong urinary and sexual problems, for example—are common. Given the intimate risks and modest benefits, prostate-cancer screening is not explicitly recommended by public-health or physician groups; instead, patients and their doctors are left to their own devices. I have heard from many urologists and primary-care doctors that this process can be baffling and unsatisfying for them and their patients alike. Patients may feel overwhelmed by the complexity of the scientific data, and doctors often feel that they are abandoning their responsibility to offer patients a clear recommendation.

Routine immunizations do not inhabit the sort of gray zone that would warrant such an elaborate discussion. Take the hepatitis-B shot. Everyone who doesn’t get it is susceptible at some point in their life to infection with the virus, which, if it becomes chronic, commonly results in serious liver damage and liver cancer. The vaccine is highly effective at preventing this infection, and its potential harms are either very mild or extremely rare. Vaccination also benefits entire communities by reducing spread of the disease. What would a shared decision even look like in this case? On one hand, a doctor might tell her patient, a very safe immunization can effectively prevent a potentially deadly disease across your child’s entire life. On the other hand, anti-vaccine activists have asserted, without convincing evidence, that vaccination comes with a host of possible dangers.

Shrouding established immunizations in the confusion of shared decision making does not add nuance; it introduces only ambiguity. The Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of the Surgeon General, and public health as a whole exist in large part to offer scientifically accurate advice that doesn’t take a physician to understand. The system that Means seemed to be proposing for the measles shot during her confirmation hearing is so absurd that it left Senator Bill Cassidy—a doctor himself—apparently dumbfounded. At one point, Cassidy wondered whether Means was likening immunizations to something as risky as a bypass surgery, which does require a doctor and patient to intensively discuss the risks and benefits. (Means did not directly answer the question, and instead responded, “The constraints on doctors are monumental, and many American parents are frustrated by what they feel like is lack of transparency on the issue of vaccines.”) The comparison was clarifying. The risks of coronary-artery-bypass surgery, which involves cracking someone’s chest open and stopping their heart, are hardly in the same league as a vaccine-induced sore arm or a mild fever—or even the statistically minuscule risk of a serious side effect, such as anaphylaxis.

[Read: Well, that didn’t sound like Casey Means]

Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, wrote in an email after this article was published that “forcing decisions down the throats of patients is what is driving confusion and mistrust, not Dr. Means suggesting that patients should play an active role in their health care.” Means herself declined to comment. Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for HHS, wrote in an email that the CDC “has an established tradition of applying shared clinical decision-making when individuals may benefit from vaccination, but broad vaccination of people in that group is unlikely to have population-level impacts.” Nixon cited COVID vaccines, which provide only modest protection against infection, as appropriate candidates for shared clinical decision making. But in seeming contrast to Means’s testimony, he indicated that such an approach would not be appropriate for the measles shot.

The administration’s defenders might argue that shared clinical decision making is a way to ensure that informed-consent discussions occur reliably, or that the practice constitutes a calculated retreat from the sort of public-health paternalism that lost credibility during the coronavirus pandemic. Nixon suggested as much, writing that this story’s framing is an attempt at “reputation rehabilitation of the experts who presided over a sharp decline in public trust.”

Yet the administration is applying epistemic modesty selectively. When HHS announced the government’s new set of dietary guidelines earlier this year, the instructions were unambiguous: Americans “must prioritize whole, nutrient-dense foods—protein, dairy, vegetables, fruits, healthy fats, and whole grains—and dramatically reduce highly processed foods,” Kennedy said in an accompanying press release. President Trump and Kennedy have also confidently instructed Americans on what they say is the proper use of Tylenol. “You shouldn’t take it during pregnancy,” Kennedy told the podcaster Joe Rogan recently, due to what his administration perceives as a heightened risk of autism associated with the painkiller. At a September press conference, Trump instructed pregnant women to “fight like hell” not to take the drug. Nixon defended the administration’s definitive language, writing, “Delivering a message about a specific neurological risk for babies is another example of our commitment to telling the truth about public health.” But among scientists, the alleged connection between Tylenol and developmental disorders remains quite controversial.

Meanwhile, many leaders of the Make America Healthy Again movement have repeatedly undermined the very professionals whom they now insist patients consult before every shot. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has accused doctors of relying on “dogma” and “groupthink.” Vinay Prasad, the FDA’s top vaccine regulator, aggressively sowed distrust in public-health authorities before becoming one himself. Kennedy has celebrated “the pediatricians who earn families’ trust every day,” but also has accused the American Academy of Pediatrics of being beholden to pharmaceutical companies; in an interview last summer, Kennedy said that “trusting the experts is not a feature of either science or democracy.” Means, too, has seemingly contradicted the advice she is now giving. A chapter of Means’s book, Good Energy, is titled “Trust Yourself, Not Your Doctor”; in a 2024 Free Press essay adapted from the book, Means wrote, “Most health advice ends with a disclaimer to ‘consult your doctor.’ I have a different conclusion: When it comes to preventing and managing chronic disease, you should not trust the medical system.”

[Read: America’s would-be surgeon general says to trust your ‘heart intelligence’]

The Medicaid and Medicare administrator, Mehmet Oz, a former cardiothoracic surgeon, seems to be one of the few federal health officials who understand the stakes of instructing Americans to embark on in-depth conversations with their doctor before getting routine vaccinations. Oz has counseled countless patients about major heart surgery, but he hasn’t felt the need to prevaricate about something as straightforward as the measles shot. “Take the vaccine, please,” he pleaded recently in an interview on CNN. It’s just the sort of clarity that was once prosaic in medicine and public health, but risks extinction under Kennedy’s leadership.

Shot day

Mar. 5th, 2026 08:52 am
susandennis: (Default)
[personal profile] susandennis
On Thursdays, I play volleyball, pick up and deliver the Timber Ridge Times and give myself a shot. All before 9. But today there is no Timber Ridge Times so my schedule is already fubared. But, now I'm caught up.

Yesterday I spent the day inside my apartment seeing no one after we got home from the vet's. Probably today I will do the same. I did get the sleeves on my new jacket shortened and I started a new yarn project which I may or may not continue. And I started a new book by a favorite author which is so far a disappointment.

The cats' water fountain quit fountaining. I'm ready for a new/different one anyway so it works out fine.

I got offered a job. Legit pay job. The company that makes the financial software I use, wants to hire me. Part time for kind of customer service. I appreciate the offer but I just can't squeeze it into my schedule. My finances are now so dirt simple, I really only use their software to collect the data which, honestly, I could do manually nearly as easily.

I just cut off all my fingernails. It always makes me feel like I should donate them to some forensic endeavor. Probably I'm just watching too much crime TV or reading too many crime books.

Somehow my kitchen has gotten itself into a mess. So first I'm going to get dressed and then I'm going to clean it up. And then I'm going to ... ahhhh the joy of retirement.

Fancake's Theme for March: Siblings

Mar. 5th, 2026 09:21 am
runpunkrun: combat boot, pizza, camo pants = punk  (punk rock girl)
[personal profile] runpunkrun
Photograph of two adorable Vietnamese toddlers in identical denim overalls and dinosaur sweaters, text: Siblings, at Fancake.
[community profile] fancake's theme for March is Siblings! Assigned, chosen, other, it doesn't matter what kind of siblings they are as long as they're wearing matching dinosaur sweaters. jk

If you have any questions about this theme, or the comm, come talk to me!
[syndicated profile] rest_of_world_rss_feed

Posted by Rina Chandran

The ongoing conflict in the Middle East has brought artificial intelligence and the technology behind unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, into sharp focus. The U.S. military is using the most...

Thankful Thursday

Mar. 5th, 2026 06:07 pm
mdlbear: Wild turkey hen close-up (turkey)
[personal profile] mdlbear

Today I am thankful for...

  • Being in what the medical people I've spoken to lately say is reasonably good health for my age. My blood pressure has responded well to my latest prescription (10mg/day of lisinopril). But walking more than .75km hurts, and I am NOT thankful for that.
  • Ginger, garlic, chocolate, and coffee. And other tasty things too numerous to mention.
  • Free faxing with Dropbox.
  • My mail finally catching up with me. (Too late to prevent problems, but hopefully not too late to prevent disaster.)
  • My support groups.

A new voting rights battle

Mar. 5th, 2026 04:00 pm
[syndicated profile] marshallprojectemail_feed






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
The Marshall Project · 156 West 56th Street · Studio, 3rd Floor · New York, NY 10019 · USA

[syndicated profile] theatlantic_global_feed

Posted by Graeme Wood

Iran still has not formally announced the identity of its new supreme leader. The new guy will be, according to Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz, “an unequivocal target for elimination.” Israel’s success in this department raises the possibility of certain efficiencies for Iran’s cash-strapped government: serving, as in Hamlet, the remains of the new supreme leader’s inaugural banquet as cold leftovers at the same man’s funeral the next day. Most likely, the Assembly of Experts charged with appointing the supreme leader will delay the announcement in order to consider how best to protect the designee’s life and prepare for smooth succession if it cannot.

The choice the group makes will determine a great deal about Iran’s future as a theocratic state. So far, the name that has been mentioned most often is that of Mojtaba Khamenei, the 56-year-old son of Ali Khamenei, who was assassinated in a joint U.S.-Israeli operation on Saturday after ruling Iran since 1989. Some have suggested that Mojtaba might be a modernizing autocrat, ready to consolidate power brutally but institute much-needed reform. That is pure fantasy. Last month, before the outbreak of war, one acquaintance of Mojtaba’s told me that he was “the most dangerous man in the world” and considerably more violent and ideological than his father.

[Karim Sadjadpour: The death of Khamenei and the end of an era]

One thing Mojtaba is not is a religious scholar, fit to lead a country whose founding revolutionary purpose was to place the state under the total authority of the most distinguished Shiite jurist. His father came up short on this score too—but not as short as Mojtaba. Upon appointment, Ali was a hojjat al-Islam, a journeyman jurist, one grade below ayatollah. (In elevating Ali, the Assembly of Experts passed over Hussein-Ali Montazeri, a grand ayatollah, whose scholarly chops eclipsed Khamenei’s but who had recently fallen out with the regime.) Mojtaba has studied religion but is not even a hojjat al-Islam. The typical currency of clerical power is the number of people who freely choose to follow your guidance when you deliver rulings on what Islam commands, whether in personal matters or political ones. Very few deferred to Ali Khamenei in matters of Islamic law when he was elevated, and no one at all cares what his son has to say on these issues. Many fear Mojtaba, but they fear his secular clout. In U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks, Iranian sources complained even 18 years ago that Mojtaba had grown too strong and was running his father’s office. (They also claimed that he traveled repeatedly to London for impotency treatment.)

Being the son of the previous leader is, if anything, a drawback. The Islamic Revolution that toppled the shah mocked the idea of hereditary succession, and boasted that scholarship alone—religious merit—determined their choice of leader. In their system, Shiite scholars never designated their sons as anything but office managers. “Sons don’t succeed their fathers,” the historian Meir Litvak told me before the war. “Appointing Mojtaba would violate this taboo.” He suggested that the Islamic Republic could sidestep the taboo by appointing some decrepit nonagenarian ayatollah to occupy the supreme leadership for a couple of years, then let Mojtaba take over. Perhaps none of this matters, because whoever leads Iran next will have a life expectancy measured in weeks or even days. But the appointment of someone who has no religious credentials at all would be a final act of self-delegitimation for a regime that already lacks legitimacy in the eyes of most Iranians.

The regime could look for a real ayatollah to succeed Khamenei. But if they want an ayatollah whose views are compatible with the hard-liners’, and who is himself a true believer in the Iranian theocratic system, the options are few. “The cupboard is bare,” David Patel, an expert on political Shiism at Harvard, told me. But he said that no matter which cleric Iran’s leaders choose, a reckoning is coming for Shiism. Iran’s most famous cleric’s death will soon be followed by the actuarially imminent death of Iraq’s most famous cleric, 95-year-old Ali Sistani. This moment of turnover will be a generational shift, an opportunity for younger clerics to assert themselves as candidates to replace them. “If I were an aspiring second-tier ayatollah, I might see my chance to stake out positions, either reformist or jihad-against-America,” Patel said.

[Quinta Jurecic: Trump’s unauthorized war]

Other candidates for the job of supreme leader include the interim supreme leader, Ayatollah Alireza Arafi. He is an academic administrator and might have the authority to keep these upstarts in line. Having a religious lightweight like Mojtaba in charge would mean even more space for these younger clerics to innovate and take unusual positions. Whether the current war will change Iran’s regime is still unclear. But it has already changed, or at least accelerated, the dynamics of the clergy.

bloodygranuaile: (Default)
[personal profile] bloodygranuaile
March’s Discworld reread was Equal Rites, which is both a Discworld book and an entry in one of my most lifelong favorite subgenres of fantasy, Little Girls Rebelling Against Gender Roles. After nearly 40 years of this and seeing how little progress has been made in those 40 years I don’t love this quite as much as I did when I was myself a Little Girl with mixed feelings on how I was supposed to Rebel Against Gender Roles (the good and proper kind of Rebelling Against Gender Roles for girls in the ‘90s was to do sports, which I wasn’t interested in; the incorrect kind was to want to be a Catholic priest, which I was). It’s less complicated when reading pseudo-medieval fantasy novels where the things they are trying to do are not really choices for either gender, like being a knight or, in this case, a wizard.

Overall this is still very much an early Discworld book and it shows–it’s shorter, more episodic, and a little more ‘80s, having been published the same year I was born. But it’s still very funny, full of groanworthy puns and comically unflattering character descriptions. Most importantly, it introduces us to Granny Weatherwax, one of the all-time iconic characters of the Discworld, and her concept of “headology,” which I occasionally forget is not a real word outside of Discworld fans and have been known to use like I think people should know what I’m talking about. Anyway, despite being a little clunky at times, the gender politics of this one are reasonably solid, dunking on both gender essentialism and the devaluation of traditional “women’s work” (it’s amazing how many people manage to fumble one or the other of these). I had fun revisiting it.

The bird report

Mar. 5th, 2026 08:31 am
offcntr: (berrybear)
[personal profile] offcntr
There's a wren in the blackberry brambles behind my studio,  singing his little heart out, been there for several weeks. Flocks of robins have been populating trees around the neighborhood,  and the waxwings came through on their annual migration earlier this week. Just yesterday, I saw a chickadee at the seed feeder, the first since last fall.


Good to have everyone back.

Community Recs Post!

Mar. 5th, 2026 10:17 am
glitteryv: (Default)
[personal profile] glitteryv posting in [community profile] recthething
Every Thursday, we have a community post, just like this one, where you can drop a rec or five in the comments.

This works great if you only have one rec and don't want to make a whole post for it, or if you don't have a DW account, or if you're shy. ;)

(But don't forget: you can deffo make posts of your own seven days a week. ;D!)

So what cool fanart/fics/fanvids/fancrafts/other kinds of fanworks/podfics have we discovered this week? Drop it in the comments below. Anon comment is enabled.

BTW, AI fanworks are not eligible for reccing at recthething. If you aware that a fanwork is AI-generated, please do not rec it here.

Signs Of Spring

Mar. 5th, 2026 02:37 pm
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
 That was a mild winter. But very wet.

And now I'm moving into my lighter clothes- though in the expectation- but not the hope- that I may have to revert from time to time. The sunny weather makes me want to be doing things in the garden, but only things that aren't too arduous. Yesterday I surprised myself by proposing a visit to Hilliers- the garden centre on the further side of Stone Cross. 

Also yesterday a bumble bee got into the bedroom and had to be helped to escape. Bumble bees have been active for a week or more now. Bumble bees are precious......

crepitate

Mar. 5th, 2026 07:19 am
prettygoodword: text: words are sexy (Default)
[personal profile] prettygoodword
crepitate (KREP-i-tayt) - v., to make a crackling or popping sound.


In medical contexts, this can be used specifically of, for example, arthritic joints or breathing during certain respiratory diseases. Taken in 1623 from Latin crepitātus, perfect passive participle of crepitare, to creak/rattle/clatter/crackle, frequentive of crepāre, to creak/crash/break with a noise.

---L.
[syndicated profile] flowing_data_rss_feed

Posted by Nathan Yau

About eight million Americans reported being unemployed, based on the Current Population Survey from January 2026. Why they were unemployed varies across groups. Here are the reasons by age and highest education attained.

Read More

[syndicated profile] flowing_data_rss_feed

Posted by Nathan Yau

This week is about animating data to better show insights and to keep citizens of the internets engaged.

Become a member for access to this — plus tutorials, courses, and guides.

Profile

asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (Default)
asakiyume

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 5th, 2026 06:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios