Alas, the flower was a fraud
Sep. 1st, 2015 08:56 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I should be less credulous.
I noticed in the photo I'd taken the other day that the stalk in the background looked spattered, as if by paint. This morning I went back and looked at the flower again. It's closed up now, and you can clearly see where the paint hit and where it didn't.
Ah well!


ETA: To see what genuine pigmented Queen Anne's Lace looks like, check out this photo by
clarentine on Flickr:

I noticed in the photo I'd taken the other day that the stalk in the background looked spattered, as if by paint. This morning I went back and looked at the flower again. It's closed up now, and you can clearly see where the paint hit and where it didn't.
Ah well!


ETA: To see what genuine pigmented Queen Anne's Lace looks like, check out this photo by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)

no subject
Date: 2015-09-01 01:00 pm (UTC)and you're not credulous at all! You observed, recorded, considered, rechecked and are now setting the records straight. This is highly scientific, non-credulous method at work!
no subject
Date: 2015-09-01 01:03 pm (UTC)Thanks for giving me a better way of looking at it!
no subject
Date: 2015-09-01 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-01 01:09 pm (UTC)