![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Sometime ago I started a petition asking Amazon to reform its warehouse conditions. It was a very limited petition, but having those signatures behind me gave force to my letter to the investor relations department. (I'm not an investor in Amazon, but IR people are very sensitive to the company's image, and they report to the board, so they were my contact point with the board.)
The letter they sent back basically asserts that their current practices are fine--better than many. Of course, better than many doesn't necessarily make them good. It may just mean that conditions widespread are pretty appalling. But if that's true, then the struggle needs to be a broader one, and the company isn't any more culpable than many others.
That's if what they claim is true. I'd like to see what a neutral party, like OSHA, had to say. But that's more serious activism; that takes time and research, and then considered advocacy, thinking of the whole thing in the context of jobs, national standards, etc. More effort than simply starting a petition.
I don't think the effort was a waste of time, though. It got their attention and compelled them to write a response. We showed this is something some portion of the public cares about and will be watching and judging Amazon on. That fact will be transmitted to the board and to management, and that should--I hope--make the company less likely to move in a more-abusive direction and more likely to move in a positive one.
On the other hand, Amazon's currently trying to bring Hachette to its knees so . . . yeah.

The letter they sent back basically asserts that their current practices are fine--better than many. Of course, better than many doesn't necessarily make them good. It may just mean that conditions widespread are pretty appalling. But if that's true, then the struggle needs to be a broader one, and the company isn't any more culpable than many others.
That's if what they claim is true. I'd like to see what a neutral party, like OSHA, had to say. But that's more serious activism; that takes time and research, and then considered advocacy, thinking of the whole thing in the context of jobs, national standards, etc. More effort than simply starting a petition.
I don't think the effort was a waste of time, though. It got their attention and compelled them to write a response. We showed this is something some portion of the public cares about and will be watching and judging Amazon on. That fact will be transmitted to the board and to management, and that should--I hope--make the company less likely to move in a more-abusive direction and more likely to move in a positive one.
On the other hand, Amazon's currently trying to bring Hachette to its knees so . . . yeah.

no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:30 pm (UTC)We have beaten back plenty of good regulation and good law over the past thirty-three years or so by means of personal anecdotes-- "This was an inconvenient regulation and no way would I have been unsafe! I'm a PRO!"-- and conjectural anecdotes-- "Well, hey, if this instance occurred that regulation/law would have perverse/undesirable consequences!" So I don't reckon much on the "inadequate anecdotes" thing.
And I am a veteran of "*sneer* Your statistics just aren't moving" and "*sneer* There, there, that's just anecdotal."
Of course we need worldwide efforts to improve working environments by requiring firms to behave as if their employees were precious resources, if not as if their employees were fellow-humans. But that's no reason not to work on improving the behaviour of industry bellwethers.
Grrrrrrrrrrr.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 06:56 pm (UTC)By the way, I was thinking of you when I read this article about Subcomandante Marcos. (http://upsidedownworld.org/main/news-briefs-archives-68/4867-subcomandante-marcos-is-no-more)
no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 07:42 pm (UTC)By the way, did you see my post with the paper I wrote on the trip and some follow up emails with said professor? I know you were interested in what my experience was like.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 07:58 pm (UTC)http://stormdog.livejournal.com/855517.html
I didn't want to pester you with direct messages or anything ("Hey, did you see the nifty stuff I wrote? *grins*), but I wanted to make sure you got a chance to see it if you hadn't.
I'm still planning to write a second part more focused on the day-to-day trip.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-30 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-29 09:13 pm (UTC)How they get away with all of this while other large corporations are carefully monitored is beyond me.
Thank you for being there to make a difference. Every voice heard is a voice standing against them.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-30 12:36 pm (UTC)Don't thank me; I do hardly anything. I feel like a fraud if I get thanks :-\ (Not meaning to scold--I appreciate the support…. Just feel unworthy is all.)
no subject
Date: 2014-06-02 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-02 02:10 am (UTC)The letter from Amazon got me thinking: I'd been moved to act based on news stories I'd seen, but I read them completely uncritically, and various feedback I've gotten (not just from Amazon, but from other people online on Facebook etc.) makes me think that the situation isn't as stark as the news stories made it seem.
I'm really glad your own experience wasn't so bad. Maybe the case of the warehouse in Pennsylvania without the air conditioning was an aberration--or maybe things went downhill for a while after your stint there, but now things are better again. In any case, thanks for dropping by!
no subject
Date: 2014-06-02 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-02 02:59 am (UTC)Allentown opened after I left, but one of the managers I worked with had complained that the work environment was tougher than what we had in south Central PA.
I'm a little surprised it got that out of control because managers were docked bonuses for accidents - and they were 100% scrupulous about reporting AT THE TIME. I'll hit up a couple people on FB to verify for you.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-02 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-02 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-02 03:07 am (UTC)