Entry tags:
Noon and Midnight Lands
Poor Noon and Midnight Lands: I really doubt it’s going to find an agent. It’s been glanced at by a number of agents, and it’s not something any are wild about. Or perhaps it’s something they think isn’t right for the market, and if that’s the case, they may well be right. I had the good fortune to have an editor at a quite respectable publishing house look at it, and although she kindly said that she “read with interest, as it is imaginative and nicely written,” she went on to say, “Regretfully in the end I'm afraid my enthusiasms aren't strong enough to support a publishing offer.” So if any agent were to fall in love with it, perhaps they’d have an uphill battle persuading a publisher to take it.
I could change it to try to make it more palatable to the publishing world, but I don’t want to. If I’m going to spend time on a novel, I’d rather start a fresh one. And The Noon and Midnight Lands, just as it is, is the story I wanted to tell. Then too, even if I did revise it—made it start more expeditiously, removed the our-world main character so that it wasn’t a crossover fantasy, etc. etc.—it still might not appeal.
But meanwhile, in some ways, I feel really blessed in the success I’ve had with it. The people who have read it seem genuinely to have enjoyed it, which has delighted me no end. They have liked the world the way I liked the world—it seems like it’s been real for them, the way it’s real for me. Opening up new worlds for people—well, it’s wonderful.
Which is all by way of a preamble to say that I’ve set a deadline for how long I’m going to try hunting for an agent for this book. And if I don’t find an agent by that date, then I’m going to find a way of making the story available online—after first registering my copyright. I’ll probably do some combination of offering it free and charging for it, but I haven’t really thought that far ahead.
For me it’s not either-or with regard to non-traditional and traditional forms of publishing. I have no qualms about doing a little bit of everything.
And, too, consider this list of best-selling novels of 1910. How many works are familiar to you? How many authors’ names do you recognize? There are a few well-known works and well-known authors, but there are also lots that I bet I'm not alone in not knowing. This isn't to say they aren't good--they may be wonderful. They were certainly popular at the time. But now... forgotten.
Then there’s the artist and and poet William Blake. He eked out a living as an engraver, self-published his stuff, and we still remember him today.
…not that I’m ever going to be a William Blake. It’s just good to remember that there are all kinds of ways of doing things, and all kinds of measures of accomplishment.

I could change it to try to make it more palatable to the publishing world, but I don’t want to. If I’m going to spend time on a novel, I’d rather start a fresh one. And The Noon and Midnight Lands, just as it is, is the story I wanted to tell. Then too, even if I did revise it—made it start more expeditiously, removed the our-world main character so that it wasn’t a crossover fantasy, etc. etc.—it still might not appeal.
But meanwhile, in some ways, I feel really blessed in the success I’ve had with it. The people who have read it seem genuinely to have enjoyed it, which has delighted me no end. They have liked the world the way I liked the world—it seems like it’s been real for them, the way it’s real for me. Opening up new worlds for people—well, it’s wonderful.
Which is all by way of a preamble to say that I’ve set a deadline for how long I’m going to try hunting for an agent for this book. And if I don’t find an agent by that date, then I’m going to find a way of making the story available online—after first registering my copyright. I’ll probably do some combination of offering it free and charging for it, but I haven’t really thought that far ahead.
For me it’s not either-or with regard to non-traditional and traditional forms of publishing. I have no qualms about doing a little bit of everything.
And, too, consider this list of best-selling novels of 1910. How many works are familiar to you? How many authors’ names do you recognize? There are a few well-known works and well-known authors, but there are also lots that I bet I'm not alone in not knowing. This isn't to say they aren't good--they may be wonderful. They were certainly popular at the time. But now... forgotten.
Then there’s the artist and and poet William Blake. He eked out a living as an engraver, self-published his stuff, and we still remember him today.
…not that I’m ever going to be a William Blake. It’s just good to remember that there are all kinds of ways of doing things, and all kinds of measures of accomplishment.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
which is a good one, and can involve
amazon sale, retaining rights to close
down the book and give it to another publisher
until you isbn it, may I recommend a
friend in alaska
who has formatted and prepared several
manuscripts into lulu books. she is
also a good person whose journal come
to think of it you would enjoy in any
case...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Two Thoughts
Cherie Priest and John Scalzi (each in different ways, if I remember correctly) succeeded because they posted their novels online
Re: Two Thoughts
... and my book may also just not be much good; that's quite likely too. But people can enjoy not-very-good books, as well, I figure :D
no subject
These were the best sellers?! I had a phase in my life where I went gaga over Pollyanna, Gene Stanton Porter and F. H. Burnett (the only people I've read on the list, and even then it was because I combed second hand bookshops and interlibrary loaned across the country for their works) but even then I realized they were weak books...I suppose the equivalent of today's Twilight? Pollyanna is ridiculous. I loved it, but it's ridiculous and I never reread it. Porter is insane. She's a compelling writer, but her plots are soap operas. Laddie made me wince, and other than her massively famous classics Burnett is no better.
anyway-
please let me know when Noon and Midnight Lands goes up. I'm really excited to read it (especially with that title! it's so delicate and evocative).
A lot of my favorite books are the ones that are going out of print/are out of print and not very famous. There are lots of real gems out there, but unfortunately the public likes a certain type of book (Pollyanna and Porter and Burnett all wrote in the same saccharine mode) so self-publishing makes a lot of sense.
I adore your lj, and your short stories, and I'm so excited to read something longer by you!
no subject
It all depends on what you want out of writing, too. And it's not like I'll turn my back on traditional publishing, even if I do publish this online, myself. I have another novel that might be more suitable for commercial marketing...
Mainly, I just want to share my stories with as many people as I can!
I'm really glad you like my LJ--that makes me so happy! I feel really glad, too, that you let me share your life through yours.
no subject
Little Lord Fauntleroy is what I'm apologizing for. (I have a sneaking affection for it.) Then there was The Land of the Blue Flower and this other book about a homeless girl who sees rainbows and they were written in a very moralistic over the top tone that's really hard to take.
By the same token, I really enjoyed A Girl of the Limberlost but Laddie and um...the one about a girl who
stalksloves the violinist were also over the top.[I've also gotten into the habit of apologizing for them, because I adore books from that time period. There's a sweetness to them that isn't present in children and YA fiction today- the prevailing theme in YA seems to be trauma- ...but I also feel like some of them are so fluffy they become ridiculous.]
I am all over asakiyume novelage. :)
no subject
But as far as publishing goes, I don't see any reason to be a purist. *I* too would love to read your novel, and if I can't pull it off the shelf in a bookstore, I'd be happy for other options.
It made me enormously happy when several of my friends read my MG novel to their kids, who loved it (my younger son did too, and that's who I was thinking about when I wrote it).
Sometimes it is just time to move on to the next project.
I do love your short stories that I've read here!
no subject
no subject
no subject
And as I say, I already know that at least one editor wouldn't take it, so... that's not a brilliant start.
(Love-Love-Love this painting of yours, by the way!)
no subject
no subject
Thirteen-year-old Ara meets Kerrin, a boy who's never seen night. He comes from a place where the sun is always up, a land of perpetual daylight, where people never sleep. He's in our world to learn about darkness and night, because it’s into a land of eternal night that his father, the king of the daylight lands, has vanished.
Ara introduces Kerrin to the sounds and feel of darkness, and in return, he teaches her about magic. Soon after, Ara travels with Kerrin back to his world, where all times are places: dawn, daylight, twilight … and night. To learn the fate of Kerrin's father and revive the daylight lands, they'll have to journey through these lands and weave new ties of trust between the people there—while avoiding the snares laid by Kerrin’s powerful and treacherous uncle.
Re: The Noon and Midnight Lands
Thanks for your support--it will still be a while, but one way or another I will put it in your hands :-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Hope you find a publisher by your deadline. If not, doing it online and having interested readers pay, sounds like a good alternative!
no subject
no subject
I worked in a bookstore for 15 years, and in my opinion, the publishing industry is between a rock and a hard place, as they say.
If your book is sf or fantasy, you might want to look into Small Beer Press (http://www.lcrw.net/). They are local and very good, if you haven't ever run across them before.
no subject
It's fantasy, but it's YA/middle-grade fantasy, so I'm not sure it would be something Small Beer Press would consider. I do know them! I admire them tremendously and would love to be published by them. I do find them intimidating, though, because they published the marvelous books by Greer Gilman, which set a high standard! I'll see if they publish young people's things, and if they do, maybe I'll give them a try.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Kelly Link has just had her own YA collection of short stories published by...maybe Viking?
In my opinion, YA fantasy is where it's at these days. Hardly anything published for "grown-ups" and marketed in the SF section is something I'd choose to buy--it all looks so formulaic these days (with a few notable exceptions). The leeway in YA fantasy is much larger at the moment, with more interesting and imaginative plots than have been the norm of late in any part of the "genre". Where are all those books that pushed the boundaries of the genre, anyway? Perhaps in a few years, though, those kids who grew up on HP etc. will be the ones who push the adult SF/F market into new directions.
Or maybe I'm just making this up as I go along. One perspective, one corner of Western Mass...hard to say!
no subject
no subject
You're right to not back down from your story for the sake of trying to sell it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I tell myself all the time about Madeleine L'Engle and how long it took her to get an acceptance.
I have a whole other finished novel that may be more marketable, though it needs some work on its ending. And, I have several ideas for other novels, and one that I've been mulling in my head for a while, in particular. This experience with The Noon and Midnight Lands, though, has given me pause. I do want to *share* what I write, don't want it just to sit on my computer...
I would love to be published in the traditional way--of course I would--because I could reach more people that way. And that still may happen. It may even happen with this book, though I feel less sanguine about it. I figure, I can do both, if it comes to that. I can be shopping around a different novel in the traditional way, and offering this one online.
I'm really, really happy, too, when I see people like you getting published and having success--just like I'm happy when I see
ETA: "people like you"--what stupid thing for me to say! All I mean, really, is people. "People like you"="people like me"--so when "people like you" get published, it gives *me* hope. Sorry... sometimes I amaze myself with my poor word choice.... hmmm, maybe *that's* my problem.
no subject
And I love seeing all the different ways real people find to do this, too--I definitely don't think my way is the only one, and only meant to say that that can work, too. :-) (Though how you define "working" is a whole other can of worms anyway ...)
no subject
So:
set it aside for five years, and then reread it. Could be, your craft will have leaped forward enough for you to see just where to give it a bit more dazzle.
or
Set it aside. It's done, it's what it is. You do not foresee changing it, in which case, you write the next. That one may be the one to get the agent . . . the sale . . . and the audience, in which case, when editor or agent say, "Is there a chance you have anything else ready, until you write your next?" you can say, "Why yes, I happen to have one!"
no subject
Is it my first novel if I also wrote one at 15 and submitted to a publisher (and got a rejection)? That novel--written on a typewriter--is in a lockbox in my living room.
... I guess it's my first finished novel since becoming an adult--well, second; technically, I finished Majestico's Pocket Circus before I finished this, though I started this first.
I do think it's quite possible this one isn't very good. I do hope I'll get better with time and practice. But... I guess I want to share this one, even though it's bad, or may be bad. I know, I know... then I'll have hideous journeyman prose out there for all the world to see... but if I do self publish it, let's face it: not that many people will see it. The people who read this blog, maybe, and maybe a couple others? Do you think it would actually hurt me? I mean, i guess someone--an agent or someone--might stumble upon it, read it, and think "she's not very good," but if then I had a better novel, at some point in the future, and submitted it, do you think they'd hold the bad prose of a previous novel against me?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm just impatient, and I know it's not a good thing. My impatience has caused me problems more times than I can name. I always come up with justifications, at the time, for acting out of impatience, but then, in retrospect, I see how things could have been better if I took the time, waited, practiced, etc.
no subject
no subject
That's how I treat comments, too. Unless someone expressly says "Please tell me what's wrong with this and how I can improve it," I tend, in journal comments, to talk about the things I like. If something glaring strikes me, I send a private message.
no subject
Another thing, I keep trying to figure out how to start a crit community. The thing that holds me back is the usual stuff: nobody wants to spend their time monitoring it, yet who's to see that members aren't just demanding crits but not offering them, and checking to make sure the crits aren't 1) sloppy or 2) irritating rewrites of your material, rather than discussions and reactions.
no subject
I'm pretty good at not demanding more crits than I give because I have so little material to offer people to read....
no subject
no subject
just an editor by profession--maybe a natural born reader, though.
no subject
Wow, that explains your amazingly good eye. All I can say is, the problem would be, if you were in a crit group, everyone would be asking for you, and talk about a busman's holiday.
no subject
no subject
The advice I always hear is: write a book, submit it, and meanwhile, write another book. The balance of your universe does not rest on this one story. The next one you write will be even better, and the next one after that...
no subject
I know that the more I write, the better I'll get. I don't think that every last thing out of my mouth is diamonds.
... but can we sometimes share things that aren't diamonds... maybe can some things just not be diamonds?
Maybe not ask money for it, even. Just... share it? I've read stuff by novice writers, stuff that wouldn't get published, probably, but that was alive and interesting and fun, even though it had flaws. Yeah, best would be that the person one day, having improved, reworked the story and so made it better, and it got published. But what if that doesn't happen? I'm still glad I saw the story--my life is richer by one story.
no subject
I just think...I don't want you to be impatient with this. I don't want you to shoot yourself in the foot before you've even really gotten started.
Like Sherwood said about you just starting out on your serious writing: there's still a lot of time and a lot of room. There's no need for things to happen *now*. You just need to write.
Your books will be shared. Others will read them. You write wonderful stories. But give them time.
no subject
no subject
Agents like to see that you have more than one ms ready to go, but I'm sure you knew that already, so it's good you've got another one in the wings. Work on more outlines, too, and consider an outline for a sequel to TNaML. Publishers LOVE books in series.
And this may be way off track, and I'm sure you already know about SCBWI, but the group that meets in Amherst is one of the most active in MA. It's been so many years since I was a member, I can't remember if YA is even considered a pertinent age group for members' discussions.
no subject
And thanks for the info about SCBWI in Amherst! It makes sense, with Holly Black being local....
no subject
I went through the same sort of frustrating experience with my first book--lots of 'I liked it, but--' comments. I hope you have better luck than I did.
no subject
I'll go take a look at